SUMITRABEN ARVINDBHAI BARIA vs ANITABEN RAYJIBHAI PATEL Advocate - P R PANDYA — 115/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,23(2). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 05th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION -JMFC
CNR: GJPM050010802025
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
07-07-2025
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
07-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMITRABEN ARVINDBHAI BARIA
Adv. A R SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
ANITABEN RAYJIBHAI PATEL Advocate - P R PANDYA
RAYJIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
RAJESHBHAI RAYJIBHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
SHUSHILABEN RAYJIBHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
BHARATBHAI MANSHUKHBHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
KOKILABEN BHARATBHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
PREMILABEN RAYSING BHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
RAYSING BHAI PATEL
Adv. P R PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Sumitraben Arvindbhai Baria. The order quashed the proceedings under Section 12 of the relevant statute, finding that the case against the petitioner could not proceed as the necessary conditions for maintaining the action were not satisfied based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Sumitraben Arvindbhai Baria. The order quashed the proceedings under Section 12 of the relevant statute, finding that the case against the petitioner could not proceed as the necessary conditions for maintaining the action were not satisfied based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts