MANSINH NARSING BARIA vs INDUBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA Advocate - L S PARMAR — 22/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPM050009742024
Filing Number
22/2024
Filing Date
10-07-2024
Registration No
22/2024
Registration Date
10-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANSINH NARSING BARIA
Adv. A C BARIA
MAGANBHAI MANSING CHAUHAN
SARDARSINH MANSINH CHAUHAN
DALABHAI MANSINH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
INDUBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA Advocate - L S PARMAR
THAKOR RAMJIBHAI BARIA
JASIBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA
REVABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
SUKALIBEN NAGARBHAI BARIA
HASMUKHBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARIA
DILIPBHAI NAGARBHAI BARIA
HANSABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
SANGEETABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
MANUBEN NAGARBHAI BARIA
DINESHBHAI CHANDANBHAI BARIA
HARIBHAI CHANDANBHAI BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 25-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No.22/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' claims. The court held that the petitioners (Mansinh Narsing Baria and others) failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Survey No.220/2) and could not establish their exclusive possession or inheritance rights. The respondents (heirs of Ramjibhai Baria) successfully demonstrated valid ownership through a will executed by Gangaben (widow of Punabhai), supported by Hindu Succession Act provisions granting full ownership rights to females, and the court upheld their title to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No.22/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' claims. The court held that the petitioners (Mansinh Narsing Baria and others) failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Survey No.220/2) and could not establish their exclusive possession or inheritance rights. The respondents (heirs of Ramjibhai Baria) successfully demonstrated valid ownership through a will executed by Gangaben (widow of Punabhai), supported by Hindu Succession Act provisions granting full ownership rights to females, and the court upheld their title to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts