MANSINH NARSING BARIA vs INDUBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA Advocate - L S PARMAR — 22/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPM050009742024
Filing Number
22/2024
Filing Date
10-Jul-2024
Registration No
22/2024
Registration Date
10-Jul-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANSINH NARSING BARIA
Adv. A C BARIA
-
2.MAGANBHAI MANSING CHAUHAN
-
3.SARDARSINH MANSINH CHAUHAN
-
4.DALABHAI MANSINH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDUBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA Advocate - L S PARMAR
-
2.THAKOR RAMJIBHAI BARIA
-
3.JASIBEN RAMJIBHAI BARIA
-
4.REVABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
-
5.SUKALIBEN NAGARBHAI BARIA
-
6.HASMUKHBHAI RAMJIBHAI BARIA
-
7.DILIPBHAI NAGARBHAI BARIA
-
8.HANSABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
-
9.SANGEETABEN CHANDANBHAI BARIA
-
10.MANUBEN NAGARBHAI BARIA
-
11.DINESHBHAI CHANDANBHAI BARIA
-
12.HARIBHAI CHANDANBHAI BARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No.22/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' claims. The court held that the petitioners (Mansinh Narsing Baria and others) failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Survey No.220/2) and could not establish their exclusive possession or inheritance rights. The respondents (heirs of Ramjibhai Baria) successfully demonstrated valid ownership through a will executed by Gangaben (widow of Punabhai), supported by Hindu Succession Act provisions granting full ownership rights to females, and the court upheld their title to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Nov-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Nov-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Oct-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Sep-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2024
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No.22/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' claims. The court held that the petitioners (Mansinh Narsing Baria and others) failed to prove ownership of the disputed land (Survey No.220/2) and could not establish their exclusive possession or inheritance rights. The respondents (heirs of Ramjibhai Baria) successfully demonstrated valid ownership through a will executed by Gangaben (widow of Punabhai), supported by Hindu Succession Act provisions granting full ownership rights to females, and the court upheld their title to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts