GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs LALITABEN W/O RANGITBHAI RATANBHAI PAGI — 281/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM050003742026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

934

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALITABEN W/O RANGITBHAI RATANBHAI PAGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 281/2026 Summary The court acquitted Lalitaben of charges under IPC Section 252 and Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence, finding the prosecution case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. However, the court convicted her under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) and sentenced her to three days imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 150, considering she confessed to the offense and this was her first conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 281/2026 Summary The court acquitted Lalitaben of charges under IPC Section 252 and Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) due to insufficient evidence, finding the prosecution case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. However, the court convicted her under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) and sentenced her to three days imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 150, considering she confessed to the offense and this was her first conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case