GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NANIBEN W/O CHATRASINH CHAUHAN — 280/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM050003732026

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

280/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

910

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANIBEN W/O CHATRASINH CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 280/2026 Summary The court acquitted Naniben W/O Chhatrasinh Chauhan of charges under IPC Section 252 and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Section 65(A)(A), finding her voluntary confession insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from all charges, with the court emphasizing that a mere admission without corroborating evidence does not constitute proof of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 280/2026 Summary The court acquitted Naniben W/O Chhatrasinh Chauhan of charges under IPC Section 252 and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Section 65(A)(A), finding her voluntary confession insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from all charges, with the court emphasizing that a mere admission without corroborating evidence does not constitute proof of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case