GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NANIBEN W/O CHATRASINH CHAUHAN — 280/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM050003732026
Filing Number
280/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
280/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
910
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NANIBEN W/O CHATRASINH CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 280/2026 Summary The court acquitted Naniben W/O Chhatrasinh Chauhan of charges under IPC Section 252 and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Section 65(A)(A), finding her voluntary confession insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from all charges, with the court emphasizing that a mere admission without corroborating evidence does not constitute proof of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 280/2026 Summary The court acquitted Naniben W/O Chhatrasinh Chauhan of charges under IPC Section 252 and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Section 65(A)(A), finding her voluntary confession insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged from all charges, with the court emphasizing that a mere admission without corroborating evidence does not constitute proof of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts