GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HARESHBHAI BHUPATBHAI BARIA Advocate - N S MALVI — 286/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA, 81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM050003642024
Filing Number
286/2024
Filing Date
09-02-2024
Registration No
286/2024
Registration Date
09-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
864
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HARESHBHAI BHUPATBHAI BARIA Advocate - N S MALVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 286/2024 Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Hareshbhai Bhupatbhai Baria and Natvarbhai Amrabhai Baria) of charges under sections 65AA and 81 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case due to critical evidentiary gaps: the panch witnesses turned hostile and denied the seizure occurred, no documentary proof of property ownership was provided, no independent locality witnesses were recorded, and no forensic report verified the seized liquid was genuine Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 286/2024 Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Hareshbhai Bhupatbhai Baria and Natvarbhai Amrabhai Baria) of charges under sections 65AA and 81 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case due to critical evidentiary gaps: the panch witnesses turned hostile and denied the seizure occurred, no documentary proof of property ownership was provided, no independent locality witnesses were recorded, and no forensic report verified the seized liquid was genuine Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts