GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RANJANBEN W/O KHUMANSINH ARJANBHAI KHANT — 250/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM050003422026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

996

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJANBEN W/O KHUMANSINH ARJANBHAI KHANT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 250/2026 The court convicted the respondent, Ranjanben, under Section 65(a)(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for possession of illicit liquor. The respondent pleaded guilty to the charge and admitted it was her first offense. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 250/2026 The court convicted the respondent, Ranjanben, under Section 65(a)(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act for possession of illicit liquor. The respondent pleaded guilty to the charge and admitted it was her first offense. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case