JAYESHKUMAR CHANDULAL SHAH vs CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL — 2050/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040029152025

Filing Number

2050/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

2050/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYESHKUMAR CHANDULAL SHAH

    Adv. D S RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 2050/2025 The court ruled that the defendant's case under Section 10 of the relevant act cannot proceed further as the plaintiff failed to pursue it. The court ordered the defendant to be acquitted and imposed costs on the plaintiff, considering the defendant's financial circumstances and citing Supreme Court precedent on legal aid eligibility. The judgment was delivered by the Halo Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 03-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2050/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2050/2025 The court ruled that the defendant's case under Section 10 of the relevant act cannot proceed further as the plaintiff failed to pursue it. The court ordered the defendant to be acquitted and imposed costs on the plaintiff, considering the defendant's financial circumstances and citing Supreme Court precedent on legal aid eligibility. The judgment was delivered by the Halo Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case