JAYESHKUMAR CHANDULAL SHAH vs CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL — 2050/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM040029152025
Filing Number
2050/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
2050/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYESHKUMAR CHANDULAL SHAH
Adv. D S RATHOD
Respondent(s)
CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 2050/2025 The court ruled that the defendant's case under Section 10 of the relevant act cannot proceed further as the plaintiff failed to pursue it. The court ordered the defendant to be acquitted and imposed costs on the plaintiff, considering the defendant's financial circumstances and citing Supreme Court precedent on legal aid eligibility. The judgment was delivered by the Halo Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 2050/2025 The court ruled that the defendant's case under Section 10 of the relevant act cannot proceed further as the plaintiff failed to pursue it. The court ordered the defendant to be acquitted and imposed costs on the plaintiff, considering the defendant's financial circumstances and citing Supreme Court precedent on legal aid eligibility. The judgment was delivered by the Halo Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts