SHITALBHAI BHAILALBHAI PATEL vs CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL Advocate - S C PARIKH — 1996/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040028072025

Filing Number

1996/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

1996/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHITALBHAI BHAILALBHAI PATEL

    Adv. D S RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG BALKRUSHNA PATEL Advocate - S C PARIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the civil case filed under Section 21 after determining that it was not maintainable in its current form. The court ordered the petitioner to pay fees and acquitted the accused of the charges. Additionally, the court declined to deposit any amount in a legal services authority based on the accused's financial circumstances, citing the Supreme Court's guidelines from Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 03-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 06-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1996/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the civil case filed under Section 21 after determining that it was not maintainable in its current form. The court ordered the petitioner to pay fees and acquitted the accused of the charges. Additionally, the court declined to deposit any amount in a legal services authority based on the accused's financial circumstances, citing the Supreme Court's guidelines from Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case