ANKURBHAI UMESHCHANDRA CHAUHAN POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD vs HASMITABEN VIJAYKUMAR SOLANKI Advocate - V R VARIA — 1983/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040027732025

Filing Number

1983/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

1983/2025

Registration Date

13-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKURBHAI UMESHCHANDRA CHAUHAN POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM FINANCE LTD

    Adv. B M MAKARANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASMITABEN VIJAYKUMAR SOLANKI Advocate - V R VARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed under Order 20 of the CPC, holding that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the case to proceed further. The court also acquitted the respondent, rejecting the allegations against them. Considering the respondent's financial circumstances and citing the Supreme Court's guidelines in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H, the court declined to direct deposit of any amount in legal services authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1983/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed under Order 20 of the CPC, holding that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient grounds for the case to proceed further. The court also acquitted the respondent, rejecting the allegations against them. Considering the respondent's financial circumstances and citing the Supreme Court's guidelines in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H, the court declined to direct deposit of any amount in legal services authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case