KALPESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs GANPATSINH FATESINH PARMAR — 1927/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM040024562023
Filing Number
1927/2023
Filing Date
06-06-2023
Registration No
1927/2023
Registration Date
06-06-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALPESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. B M MAKARANI
Respondent(s)
GANPATSINH FATESINH PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 18-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Halol Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 N.I. Act) filed by Shree Ram Transport Finance Company against Ganpatsinh Fatesinh Parmar for want of prosecution under Section 256 Cr.P.C. The court found that despite issuing non-bailable warrant, the complainant failed to locate the accused's current address and made no diligent efforts to proceed, allowing the 2023 case to remain indefinitely pending, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Halol Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138 N.I. Act) filed by Shree Ram Transport Finance Company against Ganpatsinh Fatesinh Parmar for want of prosecution under Section 256 Cr.P.C. The court found that despite issuing non-bailable warrant, the complainant failed to locate the accused's current address and made no diligent efforts to proceed, allowing the 2023 case to remain indefinitely pending, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts