KALPESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs FIRDOSHBHAI ISUBBHAI GHANCHI Advocate - P M SHEKH — 1923/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040024512023

Filing Number

1923/2023

Filing Date

06-Jun-2023

Registration No

1923/2023

Registration Date

06-Jun-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPESHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. B M MAKARANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FIRDOSHBHAI ISUBBHAI GHANCHI Advocate - P M SHEKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed the case filed under Order 22 CPC, finding the petitioner's plea to continue proceedings untenable. The court acquitted the accused, holding that depositing funds in a legal services authority as per Supreme Court guidelines was inappropriate, and directed the accused's exoneration based on financial circumstances and precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 18-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 15-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 25-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 18-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 21-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 16-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 18-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 30-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 28-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 02-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 03-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 22-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 01-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 04-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 16-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 18-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  30. 06-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  31. 18-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  32. 07-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  33. 10-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 06-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1923/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case filed under Order 22 CPC, finding the petitioner's plea to continue proceedings untenable. The court acquitted the accused, holding that depositing funds in a legal services authority as per Supreme Court guidelines was inappropriate, and directed the accused's exoneration based on financial circumstances and precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case