BARIYA ADITYA RAJENDRABHAI AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LIMITED vs ARJUNBHAI MANUBHAI HARIJAN — 1317/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM040021812024
Filing Number
1317/2024
Filing Date
18-06-2024
Registration No
1317/2024
Registration Date
18-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BARIYA ADITYA RAJENDRABHAI AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. K K SHAH
Respondent(s)
ARJUNBHAI MANUBHAI HARIJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 04-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 27-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1317/2024 The court dismissed the complaint filed by Shalibhadra Finance Limited against Arjunbhai Manubhai Harijan for want of prosecution under Section 256 of Cr.P.C., acquitting the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to serve summons despite court orders, did not comply with directives, and neither the complainant nor advocate appeared for proceedings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1317/2024 The court dismissed the complaint filed by Shalibhadra Finance Limited against Arjunbhai Manubhai Harijan for want of prosecution under Section 256 of Cr.P.C., acquitting the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant failed to serve summons despite court orders, did not comply with directives, and neither the complainant nor advocate appeared for proceedings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts