THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MOHMAD RAFIK AHEMAD DEDKI Advocate - K D MALEK — 662/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,471. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM040009532014
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
662/2014
Filing Date
04-03-2014
Registration No
662/2014
Registration Date
04-03-2014
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MOHMAD RAFIK AHEMAD DEDKI Advocate - K D MALEK
KURAIM AAIYUB ABDULGANI PANRIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 22-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 20-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-11-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Halol convicted both accused in a case involving forged examination documents. The court found that on July 11, 2013, accused Mohamad Rafiq Ahmed Dedki fraudulently appeared for a board examination using a fake exam receipt with his photograph pasted on it, impersonating the rightful candidate Faraim Ayub Abdul Gani Pateliya, with the latter's assistance. Both were found guilty under IPC sections 465, 471, and 114, and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Halol convicted both accused in a case involving forged examination documents. The court found that on July 11, 2013, accused Mohamad Rafiq Ahmed Dedki fraudulently appeared for a board examination using a fake exam receipt with his photograph pasted on it, impersonating the rightful candidate Faraim Ayub Abdul Gani Pateliya, with the latter's assistance. Both were found guilty under IPC sections 465, 471, and 114, and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment with ₹5,000 fine each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts