BARIYA ADITYA RAJENDRABHAI AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LIMITED vs BHAVIKKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI PAREKH — 138/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 30th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM040003462024

Case disposed

Filing Number

138/2024

Filing Date

15-02-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

15-02-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

30th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

BARIYA ADITYA RAJENDRABHAI AUTHORISED PERSON OF SHALIBHADRA FINANCE LIMITED

Adv. K K SHAH

Respondent(s)

BHAVIKKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI PAREKH

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

30-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

04-04-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

30-05-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 138/2024 The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Shalibhadra Finance Limited against Bhavikkumar Mahendrabhai Parekh for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner failed to serve summons on the accused despite court orders and did not appear for proceedings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The accused was consequently acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 138/2024 The court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Shalibhadra Finance Limited against Bhavikkumar Mahendrabhai Parekh for want of prosecution under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner failed to serve summons on the accused despite court orders and did not appear for proceedings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The accused was consequently acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case