JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE vs GOHIL VANRAJSINH RAMSINH — 44/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJPM040002872026
Filing Number
44/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE
Adv. P M CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
GOHIL VANRAJSINH RAMSINH
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found that the essential elements of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were satisfied based on the documentary evidence presented. The court ordered that the criminal case be registered and an inquiry be conducted against the respondent under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code, determining there were sufficient grounds to proceed with the case involving a dishonored cheque. The next hearing was scheduled for 05/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found that the essential elements of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were satisfied based on the documentary evidence presented. The court ordered that the criminal case be registered and an inquiry be conducted against the respondent under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code, determining there were sufficient grounds to proceed with the case involving a dishonored cheque. The next hearing was scheduled for 05/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts