JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE vs CHAUHAN HARESHBHAI PRATAPSINH — 43/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJPM040002862026

Filing Number

43/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE

    Adv. P M CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAUHAN HARESHBHAI PRATAPSINH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 43/2026 The court found sufficient grounds under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 to proceed against the respondent (Chauhan Hareshbhai Pratapsinh) for dishonoring a cheque deposited by Jagdishbhai Ambalal Patel (Maruti Finance proprietor). The cheque was presented to the bank but rejected due to insufficient funds; despite notice, the respondent failed to make payment within the statutory period. The court registered the criminal case and directed inquiry into the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 43/2026 The court found sufficient grounds under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 to proceed against the respondent (Chauhan Hareshbhai Pratapsinh) for dishonoring a cheque deposited by Jagdishbhai Ambalal Patel (Maruti Finance proprietor). The cheque was presented to the bank but rejected due to insufficient funds; despite notice, the respondent failed to make payment within the statutory period. The court registered the criminal case and directed inquiry into the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case