JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE vs GOHIL PRAFULKUMAR RANJITSINH — 42/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJPM040002852026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HALOL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL PATEL PROPRIETOR OF MARUTI FINANCE

    Adv. P M CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOHIL PRAFULKUMAR RANJITSINH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found that the essential elements of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were satisfied based on the documents presented, as a cheque was deposited in the bank within the stipulated period and subsequently dishonored. The court ordered the criminal case to be registered against the respondent and directed the police to investigate and file a chargesheet under Section 204 CrPC, with the next hearing scheduled for 05/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that the essential elements of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act were satisfied based on the documents presented, as a cheque was deposited in the bank within the stipulated period and subsequently dishonored. The court ordered the criminal case to be registered against the respondent and directed the police to investigate and file a chargesheet under Section 204 CrPC, with the next hearing scheduled for 05/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case