Government of Gujarat vs ANKITKUMAR NARVATSINH PARMAR Advocate - P S CHAUHAN — 162/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,325,323,365,504,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM040002392021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2021
Filing Date
11-02-2021
Registration No
162/2021
Registration Date
11-02-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ANKITKUMAR NARVATSINH PARMAR Advocate - P S CHAUHAN
SURESKHABEN @ BHURI AXAYKUMAR
Adv. P S CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 26-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all four accused of charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 326, 365, 504, 506(2), and IPC 135 for allegedly kidnapping and assaulting a young woman. Despite the complainant's detailed statement describing the abduction and brutal assault by four named individuals, the court found critical contradictions and gaps in the evidence. The judges determined that while a crime clearly occurred, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and insufficient corroborating evidence linking the specific accused to the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted all four accused of charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 326, 365, 504, 506(2), and IPC 135 for allegedly kidnapping and assaulting a young woman. Despite the complainant's detailed statement describing the abduction and brutal assault by four named individuals, the court found critical contradictions and gaps in the evidence. The judges determined that while a crime clearly occurred, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and insufficient corroborating evidence linking the specific accused to the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts