Government of Gujarat vs RASIKBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V L RATHOD — 2146/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM030028702025

Filing Number

2146/2025

Filing Date

29-Nov-2025

Registration No

2146/2025

Registration Date

29-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1122

Police Station

KALOL POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASIKBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMAR Advocate - V L RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY In Criminal Case 2146/2025, the court convicted accused Rasikbhai Mangalbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the Motor Vehicles Act for alleged drug trafficking and unlawful possession. The court imposed a lenient sentence—a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default)—considering the accused's plea of guilty, poor socioeconomic status, and first-time offense, prioritizing judicial mercy over strict punishment while upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2146/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In Criminal Case 2146/2025, the court convicted accused Rasikbhai Mangalbhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the Motor Vehicles Act for alleged drug trafficking and unlawful possession. The court imposed a lenient sentence—a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default)—considering the accused's plea of guilty, poor socioeconomic status, and first-time offense, prioritizing judicial mercy over strict punishment while upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case