Government of Gujarat vs KANUBHAI VALABHAI VANAKAR — 1787/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM030024482025
Filing Number
1787/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2025
Registration No
1787/2025
Registration Date
30-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
864
Police Station
VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANUBHAI VALABHAI VANAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1787/2025 The court convicted Kanubhai Valabhai Vanakar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(1)(b) and MV Act Section 185 for operating a motorcycle without a valid license while in an intoxicated state on 21/11/2024. The accused pleaded guilty and claimed poverty, requesting lenient punishment. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for five days and a fine of ₹1,000 (or five additional days imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), considering his first-time offence, economic hardship, and voluntary confession while maintaining that justice requires adequate deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 1787/2025 The court convicted Kanubhai Valabhai Vanakar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(1)(b) and MV Act Section 185 for operating a motorcycle without a valid license while in an intoxicated state on 21/11/2024. The accused pleaded guilty and claimed poverty, requesting lenient punishment. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for five days and a fine of ₹1,000 (or five additional days imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), considering his first-time offence, economic hardship, and voluntary confession while maintaining that justice requires adequate deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts