Government of Gujarat vs MUKESHBHAI GANAPATBHAI GOHIL — 1637/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM030022842025
Filing Number
1637/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
1637/2025
Registration Date
18-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALOL
Judge
3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
270
Police Station
VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUKESHBHAI GANAPATBHAI GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused Mukeshbhai Ganapatbhai Gohil under Section 65 IPC for prohibition offenses and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment for 10 days in default. The court granted leniency considering the accused's impoverished economic status, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, while applying sentencing principles that balance deterrence with reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1637/2025
The court convicted the accused Mukeshbhai Ganapatbhai Gohil under Section 65 IPC for prohibition offenses and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with simple imprisonment for 10 days in default. The court granted leniency considering the accused's impoverished economic status, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, while applying sentencing principles that balance deterrence with reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts