Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI RAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - S V MAKWANA — 1591/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM030022302025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1591/2025

Filing Date

18-10-2025

Registration No

1591/2025

Registration Date

18-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

168

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ARJUNBHAI RAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - S V MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

29-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Arjunbhai Ramabhai Nayak under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for the first offense, considering his poor economic circumstances and status as a laborer. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) based on mitigating factors and the principle that courts have discretion to impose minimum punishment when sufficient grounds exist, citing established jurisprudence from Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Arjunbhai Ramabhai Nayak under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for the first offense, considering his poor economic circumstances and status as a laborer. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) based on mitigating factors and the principle that courts have discretion to impose minimum punishment when sufficient grounds exist, citing established jurisprudence from Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case