Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI RAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - S V MAKWANA — 1591/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM030022302025
Filing Number
1591/2025
Filing Date
18-10-2025
Registration No
1591/2025
Registration Date
18-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ARJUNBHAI RAMABHAI NAYAK Advocate - S V MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 27-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 29-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused Arjunbhai Ramabhai Nayak under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for the first offense, considering his poor economic circumstances and status as a laborer. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) based on mitigating factors and the principle that courts have discretion to impose minimum punishment when sufficient grounds exist, citing established jurisprudence from Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused Arjunbhai Ramabhai Nayak under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for the first offense, considering his poor economic circumstances and status as a laborer. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) based on mitigating factors and the principle that courts have discretion to impose minimum punishment when sufficient grounds exist, citing established jurisprudence from Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts