Government of Gujarat vs RAJESH @ GAMO SOMABHAI RATHOD Advocate - B G PARMAR — 983/2023

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM030010712023

Filing Number

983/2023

Filing Date

09-Feb-2023

Registration No

983/2023

Registration Date

09-Feb-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

295

Police Station

KALOL POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH @ GAMO SOMABHAI RATHOD Advocate - B G PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: C.C.No. 983/2023 The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (IPC equivalent) for a first offense. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor and laborer), family responsibilities, and guilty plea, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 500 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum sentence available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 05-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 03-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 19-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 14-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 06-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 11-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 24-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 28-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 01-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 22-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 18-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 02-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 09-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 31-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 24-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 29-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 21-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 26-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 01-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 09-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 983/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No. 983/2023 The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (IPC equivalent) for a first offense. Considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances (poor and laborer), family responsibilities, and guilty plea, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 500 (or 10 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum sentence available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case