Government of Gujarat vs LAXMANBHAI NARAYANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S V MAKWANA — 453/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM030005522026

Filing Number

453/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

453/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

432

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMANBHAI NARAYANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S V MAKWANA

  2. 2.NARESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted two accused, Laxmanbhai Narayanbhai Solanki and Nareshkumar Rameshbhai Solanki, under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing illicit liquor. However, considering mitigating circumstances including their first-time offence and poor economic status, the court imposed lenient sentences: Rs. 100 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as an alternative for each accused, plus a total fine of Rs. 200 in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 453/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted two accused, Laxmanbhai Narayanbhai Solanki and Nareshkumar Rameshbhai Solanki, under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing illicit liquor. However, considering mitigating circumstances including their first-time offence and poor economic status, the court imposed lenient sentences: Rs. 100 fine with 10 days simple imprisonment as an alternative for each accused, plus a total fine of Rs. 200 in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case