Government of Gujarat vs MANOJKUMAR RATANSINH PARMAR — 155/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM030001972026

Filing Number

155/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1143

Police Station

KALOL POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJKUMAR RATANSINH PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Manojkumar Ratansinh Parmar under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 66(1), sentencing him to imprisonment up to 10 days or a fine of Rs. 1,000, considering his first offense status and poor economic circumstances. The court applied principles of judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment given the accused's socio-economic background and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Manojkumar Ratansinh Parmar under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 66(1), sentencing him to imprisonment up to 10 days or a fine of Rs. 1,000, considering his first offense status and poor economic circumstances. The court applied principles of judicial discretion to impose lenient punishment given the accused's socio-economic background and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case