MOHSIN M.YUSUF DANT vs PARMAR RASHMIKABEN VIRALKUMAR Advocate - H K SONI — 32/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O37,R2. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

SMST R - SUMMARY SUIT - REGULAR

CNR: GJPM020084952025

Filing Number

32/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT GODHRA

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O37,R2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHSIN M.YUSUF DANT

    Adv. J A SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR RASHMIKABEN VIRALKUMAR Advocate - H K SONI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: SMST No. 32/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Civil Judge, Panchmahals rejected the defendant's leave to defend application and granted summary judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 2,50,000/- to the plaintiff. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant raised only vague, illusory, and contradictory defenses (denying knowledge of the plaintiff while simultaneously claiming his husband gave the cheque for vehicle dealings; claiming poverty while stating Rs. 6,000/- monthly income). The defendant's signature on the cheque was undisputed, and she failed to explain why she didn't retrieve the cheque if the alleged vehicle transaction remained incomplete. The court determined no substantial or triable defense existed, making the summary suit procedure appropriate for swift resolution in commercial matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Leave To Defend

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Summons Of Suit

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Summons Of Suit

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Summons Of Suit

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SMST No. 32/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Civil Judge, Panchmahals rejected the defendant's leave to defend application and granted summary judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 2,50,000/- to the plaintiff. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant raised only vague, illusory, and contradictory defenses (denying knowledge of the plaintiff while simultaneously claiming his husband gave the cheque for vehicle dealings; claiming poverty while stating Rs. 6,000/- monthly income). The defendant's signature on the cheque was undisputed, and she failed to explain why she didn't retrieve the cheque if the alleged vehicle transaction remained incomplete. The court determined no substantial or triable defense existed, making the summary suit procedure appropriate for swift resolution in commercial matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case