GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs LENBUBHAI PRATAPBHAI NAYAK — 4478/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM020066912025
Filing Number
4478/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
4478/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
768
Police Station
GODHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LENBUBHAI PRATAPBHAI NAYAK
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC/4478/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Lenbubhai Pratapbhai Nayak, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), 125(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 3(1), 181. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident or driving recklessly/negligently that caused death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish specific material linking the accused to operating the vehicle when the accident occurred. Without concrete evidence proving rash or negligent driving by the accused, conviction could not be sustained. The case lacked corroborating evidence necessary to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC/4478/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Lenbubhai Pratapbhai Nayak, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), 125(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 3(1), 181. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident or driving recklessly/negligently that caused death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish specific material linking the accused to operating the vehicle when the accident occurred. Without concrete evidence proving rash or negligent driving by the accused, conviction could not be sustained. The case lacked corroborating evidence necessary to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts