GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs LENBUBHAI PRATAPBHAI NAYAK — 4478/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM020066912025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4478/2025

Filing Date

08-10-2025

Registration No

4478/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

768

Police Station

GODHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,3(1),181

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LENBUBHAI PRATAPBHAI NAYAK

Hearing History

Judge: 6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC

02-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC/4478/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Lenbubhai Pratapbhai Nayak, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), 125(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 3(1), 181. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident or driving recklessly/negligently that caused death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish specific material linking the accused to operating the vehicle when the accident occurred. Without concrete evidence proving rash or negligent driving by the accused, conviction could not be sustained. The case lacked corroborating evidence necessary to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC/4478/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Lenbubhai Pratapbhai Nayak, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 281, 106(1), 125(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 3(1), 181. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident or driving recklessly/negligently that caused death. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish specific material linking the accused to operating the vehicle when the accident occurred. Without concrete evidence proving rash or negligent driving by the accused, conviction could not be sustained. The case lacked corroborating evidence necessary to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case