ABHIMANYUSING MANAGER OF UCO BANK vs LILABEN DILIPKUMAR VANZARA — 132/2025
Case under Contract Act, 1872 Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPM020056142025
Filing Number
132/2025
Filing Date
26-08-2025
Registration No
132/2025
Registration Date
26-08-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHIMANYUSING MANAGER OF UCO BANK
Adv. I A SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
LILABEN DILIPKUMAR VANZARA
Hearing History
Judge: 7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 132/2025 UCO Bank successfully recovered Rs. 1,57,709.40 from defendant Lilaben Dilipkumar Vanzara in an ex-parte judgment, as the defendant failed to appear or contest the case. The court found that Vanzara had obtained a Pradhan Mantri Mudra Loan of Rs. 1,90,000 in 2020 for a readymade garments business but defaulted after making only partial payments, with the last payment in December 2024. The court awarded the outstanding amount with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit filing, finding the suit within the limitation period for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 132/2025 UCO Bank successfully recovered Rs. 1,57,709.40 from defendant Lilaben Dilipkumar Vanzara in an ex-parte judgment, as the defendant failed to appear or contest the case. The court found that Vanzara had obtained a Pradhan Mantri Mudra Loan of Rs. 1,90,000 in 2020 for a readymade garments business but defaulted after making only partial payments, with the last payment in December 2024. The court awarded the outstanding amount with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit filing, finding the suit within the limitation period for debt recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts