CHAUHAN VIRPALSINH LAKSHMANSINH vs SURVEERSINH SAMATSINH PARMAR Advocate - V N JADAV — 167/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 100. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 27th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJPM020034642026
Filing Number
167/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
167/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAUHAN VIRPALSINH LAKSHMANSINH
Adv. H A GOHIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURVEERSINH SAMATSINH PARMAR Advocate - V N JADAV
-
2.VIMALABEN SURSINH PARMAR
Adv. V N JADAV
-
3.KAVITABEN W/O VEERPALSINH AND D/O SURVEERSINH
Adv. V N JADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CRMAJ 167/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's request to pursue further proceedings against the respondent, finding the video evidence submitted by the respondent conclusively demonstrated that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. The court ordered the case dismissed, determining that no grounds existed for the petitioner to proceed with their challenge against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 167/2026
Case Summary: CRMAJ 167/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's request to pursue further proceedings against the respondent, finding the video evidence submitted by the respondent conclusively demonstrated that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. The court ordered the case dismissed, determining that no grounds existed for the petitioner to proceed with their challenge against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts