CHAUHAN VIRPALSINH LAKSHMANSINH vs SURVEERSINH SAMATSINH PARMAR Advocate - V N JADAV — 167/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 100. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 27th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJPM020034642026
Filing Number
167/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
167/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUHAN VIRPALSINH LAKSHMANSINH
Adv. H A GOHIL
Respondent(s)
SURVEERSINH SAMATSINH PARMAR Advocate - V N JADAV
VIMALABEN SURSINH PARMAR
Adv. V N JADAV
KAVITABEN W/O VEERPALSINH AND D/O SURVEERSINH
Adv. V N JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 7-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMAJ 167/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's request to pursue further proceedings against the respondent, finding the video evidence submitted by the respondent conclusively demonstrated that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. The court ordered the case dismissed, determining that no grounds existed for the petitioner to proceed with their challenge against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMAJ 167/2026 The court rejected the petitioner's request to pursue further proceedings against the respondent, finding the video evidence submitted by the respondent conclusively demonstrated that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. The court ordered the case dismissed, determining that no grounds existed for the petitioner to proceed with their challenge against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts