LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED NANABHAI KABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir) vs LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED GALABBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUHAN — 16/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O-9,R-4. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVILMISC. APPLN - SR/CIVIL

CNR: GJPM020026812025

Filing Number

16/2025

Filing Date

19-Apr-2025

Registration No

16/2025

Registration Date

19-Apr-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O-9,R-4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED NANABHAI KABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)

    Adv. K S VYAS1.

  2. 2.GANPATSINH NANABHAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. K S VYAS1.

  3. 3.UDESINH NANABHAI CHAUHAN THROUGH HIS P.O.A SONALBEN SHIVSINH RATHOD

    Adv. K S VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED GALABBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUHAN

  2. 2.KANKUBEN Wd/O KALUBHAI CHAUHAN

  3. 3.KAILASHBEN KALUBHAI CHAUHAN

  4. 4.LILABEN KALUBHAI CHAUHAN

  5. 5.JASHVANTSINH KALUBHAI CHAUHAN

  6. 6.LALITABEN NATWARSINH CHAUHAN

  7. 7.MANISHKUMAR NATWARSINH CHAUHAN

  8. 8.NAINABEN NATWARSINH CHAUHAN

  9. 9.KALABEN NATWARSINH CHAUHAN

  10. 10.SUB REGISTRAR SHRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA No. 16/2025 Court Decision: The 2nd Additional Civil Judge, Panchmahal allowed the restoration application and restored Regular Civil Suit No. 172/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 26/03/2025. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for the plaintiff's non-appearance, as the plaintiff's aunt (Kantaben Udesinh Patel) died on the same date the suit was dismissed (26/03/2025), constituting unavoidable circumstances. The application was filed within the limitation period. Under Order 9 Rule 4 of the CPC 1908, when sufficient cause is shown for non-appearance, the court may restore the dismissed suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  14. 19-Jun-2025

    Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  15. 15-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 19-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA No. 16/2025 Court Decision: The 2nd Additional Civil Judge, Panchmahal allowed the restoration application and restored Regular Civil Suit No. 172/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 26/03/2025. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for the plaintiff's non-appearance, as the plaintiff's aunt (Kantaben Udesinh Patel) died on the same date the suit was dismissed (26/03/2025), constituting unavoidable circumstances. The application was filed within the limitation period. Under Order 9 Rule 4 of the CPC 1908, when sufficient cause is shown for non-appearance, the court may restore the dismissed suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case