GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHKUMAR @ BHAYLU DASHRATHSINH RATHOD Advocate - D S BARIA — 517/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184,187,181,177,3. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM020008392025
Filing Number
517/2025
Filing Date
06-02-2025
Registration No
517/2025
Registration Date
06-02-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
1166
Police Station
GODHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAKASHKUMAR @ BHAYLU DASHRATHSINH RATHOD Advocate - D S BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-2ND ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: C.C. No. 517/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Prakashkumar @ Bhaylu Dashrathsinh Rathod, of charges under BNS sections 137(A), 137(B), 281, and MV Act sections 184, 187, 181, 177, and 3. Although the prosecution proved that a motor vehicle collision occurred on 19/11/2024 injuring the complainant and his wife, the evidence failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the accident. The court found insufficient proof linking the accused's vehicle to the incident or demonstrating culpable negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: C.C. No. 517/2025 The court acquitted the accused, Prakashkumar @ Bhaylu Dashrathsinh Rathod, of charges under BNS sections 137(A), 137(B), 281, and MV Act sections 184, 187, 181, 177, and 3. Although the prosecution proved that a motor vehicle collision occurred on 19/11/2024 injuring the complainant and his wife, the evidence failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the accident. The court found insufficient proof linking the accused's vehicle to the incident or demonstrating culpable negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts