GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NAUSAD @ KHALID YAKUB KAMLI Advocate - M A KOLA — 16/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 186,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM020000162023
Filing Number
16/2023
Filing Date
02-Jan-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
02-Jan-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT GODHRA
Judge
8-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
668
Police Station
GODHRA CITY - A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAUSAD @ KHALID YAKUB KAMLI Advocate - M A KOLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC/16/2023 Court Decision: The accused Nausad @ Khalid Yakub Kamli was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 186, 504, and 506(2) (obstructing public servant, insulting, and threatening). Key Reasoning: The court found that the case violated CrPC Section 195(1)(k)(1), which requires a public servant's formal complaint for prosecuting such offenses. The complaint was filed as a general police report rather than a valid formal complaint under the Criminal Procedure Code, rendering the entire proceedings legally defective. Therefore, the accused was acquitted on technical grounds due to the procedural violation, not on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Dec-2025
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-May-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2024
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Oct-2024
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2023
Case Summary: CC/16/2023 Court Decision: The accused Nausad @ Khalid Yakub Kamli was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 186, 504, and 506(2) (obstructing public servant, insulting, and threatening). Key Reasoning: The court found that the case violated CrPC Section 195(1)(k)(1), which requires a public servant's formal complaint for prosecuting such offenses. The complaint was filed as a general police report rather than a valid formal complaint under the Criminal Procedure Code, rendering the entire proceedings legally defective. Therefore, the accused was acquitted on technical grounds due to the procedural violation, not on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts