PADHIYAR JAYDIPSINH SHANTILAL vs ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR — 147/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DC
CNR: GJPM010043262025
Filing Number
147/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
147/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PADHIYAR JAYDIPSINH SHANTILAL
Adv. R M PATEL
FARUK RASULBHAI SHEIKH
Adv. R M PATEL
SURAIYABEN RASULBHAI SHEIKH
Adv. R M PATEL
Respondent(s)
ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR
COMPETENT AND ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. R S THAKOR
PROJECT DIRECTOR SHREE, NHAI, PIU AHMEDABAD
Adv. R P VYAS
PIU AHMEDABAD ON BEHALF OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY
Adv. R P VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | REPLY |
| 13-02-2026 | REPLY |
| 16-01-2026 | REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 147/2025 The 5th Additional District Judge, Panchmahals allowed the applicants' petition to extend the statutory arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found sufficient cause for extension despite the arbitrator's order that the statutory 12-month period had expired, reasoning that the delay resulted from administrative and procedural constraints rather than the applicants' fault, and that refusing extension would prejudice the land-losing farmers. The arbitrator's mandate was extended for one year from the order date to adjudicate the compensation dispute for lands acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 147/2025 The 5th Additional District Judge, Panchmahals allowed the applicants' petition to extend the statutory arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found sufficient cause for extension despite the arbitrator's order that the statutory 12-month period had expired, reasoning that the delay resulted from administrative and procedural constraints rather than the applicants' fault, and that refusing extension would prejudice the land-losing farmers. The arbitrator's mandate was extended for one year from the order date to adjudicate the compensation dispute for lands acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts