PADHIYAR JAYDIPSINH SHANTILAL vs ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR — 147/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DC

CNR: GJPM010043262025

Case disposed

Filing Number

147/2025

Filing Date

22-12-2025

Registration No

147/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5)

Petitioner(s)

PADHIYAR JAYDIPSINH SHANTILAL

Adv. R M PATEL

FARUK RASULBHAI SHEIKH

Adv. R M PATEL

SURAIYABEN RASULBHAI SHEIKH

Adv. R M PATEL

Respondent(s)

ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR

COMPETENT AND ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Adv. R S THAKOR

PROJECT DIRECTOR SHREE, NHAI, PIU AHMEDABAD

Adv. R P VYAS

PIU AHMEDABAD ON BEHALF OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY

Adv. R P VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

29-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

REPLY

13-02-2026

REPLY

16-01-2026

REPLY

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 147/2025 The 5th Additional District Judge, Panchmahals allowed the applicants' petition to extend the statutory arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found sufficient cause for extension despite the arbitrator's order that the statutory 12-month period had expired, reasoning that the delay resulted from administrative and procedural constraints rather than the applicants' fault, and that refusing extension would prejudice the land-losing farmers. The arbitrator's mandate was extended for one year from the order date to adjudicate the compensation dispute for lands acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 147/2025 The 5th Additional District Judge, Panchmahals allowed the applicants' petition to extend the statutory arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found sufficient cause for extension despite the arbitrator's order that the statutory 12-month period had expired, reasoning that the delay resulted from administrative and procedural constraints rather than the applicants' fault, and that refusing extension would prejudice the land-losing farmers. The arbitrator's mandate was extended for one year from the order date to adjudicate the compensation dispute for lands acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case