HEIRS OF DECEASED PRAVINSINH GANAPATSINH RAULAJI 1. SANGITABEN PRAVINSINH RAULAJI vs KAMLESHKUMAR HIMMATSINH SOLANKI — 56/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21.1. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJPM010041922025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF DECEASED PRAVINSINH GANAPATSINH RAULAJI 1. SANGITABEN PRAVINSINH RAULAJI
Respondent(s)
KAMLESHKUMAR HIMMATSINH SOLANKI
GIRISHKUMAR JETHABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 21-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 31-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
| 03-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed by the heirs of deceased Pravinsinh Ganapatsinh Raulaji against respondents Kamleshkumar Himmatsinh Solanki and Girishkumar Jethabhai Parmar. The judgment, dated March 14, 2026, held that since the settlement dispute between the parties had been resolved and compensation awarded by the government to the respondents, there was no further basis for continuing litigation, and accordingly the writ petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed by the heirs of deceased Pravinsinh Ganapatsinh Raulaji against respondents Kamleshkumar Himmatsinh Solanki and Girishkumar Jethabhai Parmar. The judgment, dated March 14, 2026, held that since the settlement dispute between the parties had been resolved and compensation awarded by the government to the respondents, there was no further basis for continuing litigation, and accordingly the writ petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts