GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SANDIPBHAI KANTIBHAI DAMOR Advocate - T R PATEL — 66/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPM010041682025

Case disposed

Filing Number

66/2025

Filing Date

05-12-2025

Registration No

66/2025

Registration Date

05-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

635

Police Station

MORVA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),54
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6,12,17

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

SANDIPBHAI KANTIBHAI DAMOR Advocate - T R PATEL

DILIPBHAI LALABHAI DAMOR

Adv. T R PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

02-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 66/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Sandipbhai Kantibhai Damor and Dilipbhai Lalabhai Damor, were acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 54 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 12, 17. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense. Documentary evidence regarding the victim's birth date was unreliable, and the victim's own testimony indicated she voluntarily accompanied the accused. Following Supreme Court precedent (*S. Varadarajan v. State of Madras*), the court held that consensual departure with inadequate inducement evidence does not constitute kidnapping. Additionally, no scientific or direct evidence conclusively established sexual assault, and the victim did not testify regarding non-consensual physical contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 66/2025 Court Decision: Both accused, Sandipbhai Kantibhai Damor and Dilipbhai Lalabhai Damor, were acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 54 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 12, 17. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense. Documentary evidence regarding the victim's birth date was unreliable, and the victim's own testimony indicated she voluntarily accompanied the accused. Following Supreme Court precedent (*S. Varadarajan v. State of Madras*), the court held that consensual departure with inadequate inducement evidence does not constitute kidnapping. Additionally, no scientific or direct evidence conclusively established sexual assault, and the victim did not testify regarding non-consensual physical contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case