GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAVINDRABHAI BALUBHAI BARIA Advocate - V Y TRIPATHI — 64/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 87,137(2),64(1)(2)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM010040242025
Filing Number
64/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
883
Police Station
GODHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
RAVINDRABHAI BALUBHAI BARIA Advocate - V Y TRIPATHI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case 64/2025 Court Decision: Acquittal The accused, Ravindrabhai Balubhai Baria, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1)(2)(m), 69(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense and could not prove kidnapping or sexual assault, noting the victim accompanied the accused voluntarily and no inducement was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case 64/2025 Court Decision: Acquittal The accused, Ravindrabhai Balubhai Baria, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 87, 137(2), 64(1)(2)(m), 69(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6, 12. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense and could not prove kidnapping or sexual assault, noting the victim accompanied the accused voluntarily and no inducement was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts