MOHANBHAI KALUBHAI MACHHI vs ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR — 101/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DC
CNR: GJPM010036152025
Filing Number
101/2025
Filing Date
07-10-2025
Registration No
101/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHANBHAI KALUBHAI MACHHI
Adv. H G VIRPURA
Respondent(s)
ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR
COMPETENT AND ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Adv. R S THAKOR
PROJECT DIRECTOR SHREE, NHAI, PIU AHMEDABAD
PIU AHMEDABAD ON BEHALF OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 13-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 16-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMA DC No. 101/25 Decision: The court granted the applicant's petition and extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year to complete the land compensation dispute adjudication. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for extension under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that procedural delays attributable to the arbitrator's administrative duties (as Collector) rather than the applicants' actions should not defeat substantial justice. The court emphasized that refusing extension would cause multiplicity of proceedings and serious prejudice to the land-losing farmer-applicants, whose agricultural land (survey no. 118) was acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway Project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMA DC No. 101/25 Decision: The court granted the applicant's petition and extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year to complete the land compensation dispute adjudication. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for extension under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that procedural delays attributable to the arbitrator's administrative duties (as Collector) rather than the applicants' actions should not defeat substantial justice. The court emphasized that refusing extension would cause multiplicity of proceedings and serious prejudice to the land-losing farmer-applicants, whose agricultural land (survey no. 118) was acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway Project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts