MOHANBHAI KALUBHAI MACHHI vs ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR — 101/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DC

CNR: GJPM010036152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

101/2025

Filing Date

07-10-2025

Registration No

101/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(A)(4)(5)

Petitioner(s)

MOHANBHAI KALUBHAI MACHHI

Adv. H G VIRPURA

Respondent(s)

ARBITRATOR AND COLLECTOR SHREE, PANCHMAHAL Advocate - R S THAKOR

COMPETENT AND ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Adv. R S THAKOR

PROJECT DIRECTOR SHREE, NHAI, PIU AHMEDABAD

PIU AHMEDABAD ON BEHALF OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY

Hearing History

Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

29-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

13-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

16-01-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CMA DC No. 101/25 Decision: The court granted the applicant's petition and extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year to complete the land compensation dispute adjudication. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for extension under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that procedural delays attributable to the arbitrator's administrative duties (as Collector) rather than the applicants' actions should not defeat substantial justice. The court emphasized that refusing extension would cause multiplicity of proceedings and serious prejudice to the land-losing farmer-applicants, whose agricultural land (survey no. 118) was acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway Project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA DC No. 101/25 Decision: The court granted the applicant's petition and extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year to complete the land compensation dispute adjudication. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient cause for extension under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that procedural delays attributable to the arbitrator's administrative duties (as Collector) rather than the applicants' actions should not defeat substantial justice. The court emphasized that refusing extension would cause multiplicity of proceedings and serious prejudice to the land-losing farmer-applicants, whose agricultural land (survey no. 118) was acquired for the Ahmedabad-Indore National Highway Project. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case