SHAH NAIMUDDIN IKBAL vs KESHAV HIRACHAND MISTRI — 390/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJPM010035522025

Case disposed

Filing Number

390/2025

Filing Date

03-10-2025

Registration No

390/2025

Registration Date

03-10-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

SHAH NAIMUDDIN IKBAL

Adv. R S PALLIVAR

Respondent(s)

KESHAV HIRACHAND MISTRI

HIRANAND MAHAVIRPRASAD MISTRI

Liberty General Insurance Ltd.

Adv. A B RAVAL

Hearing History

Judge: 19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

09-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

16-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The National Lok Adalat approved a settlement agreement in motor accident case 390/2025, awarding compensation of Rs. 25,000 to petitioner Shah Naimuddin Ikbal against respondents Keshav Hirachand Mistri, Hiranand Mahavirprasad Mistri, and Liberty General Insurance Ltd. The court directed payment of the settlement amount into the tribunal, exempted court fees under the Legal Service Authority Act, and recorded the award on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalat approved a settlement agreement in motor accident case 390/2025, awarding compensation of Rs. 25,000 to petitioner Shah Naimuddin Ikbal against respondents Keshav Hirachand Mistri, Hiranand Mahavirprasad Mistri, and Liberty General Insurance Ltd. The court directed payment of the settlement amount into the tribunal, exempted court fees under the Legal Service Authority Act, and recorded the award on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case