MOHMED AZAHAR MOHMED ISMAIL vs KESHAV HIRACHAND MISTRI — 389/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJPM010035512025
Filing Number
389/2025
Filing Date
03-Oct-2025
Registration No
389/2025
Registration Date
03-Oct-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHMED AZAHAR MOHMED ISMAIL
Adv. R S PALLIVAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KESHAV HIRACHAND MISTRI
-
2.HIRANAND MAHAVIRPRASAD MISTRI
-
3.Liberty General Insurance Ltd.
Adv. A B RAVAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission approved a settlement between petitioner Mohmed Azahar Mohmed Ismail and respondents Keshav Hirachand Mistri and Hiranand Mahavirprasad Mistri, awarding compensation of ₹3,00,000 in a motor accident claim (Case 389/2025). The court directed deposit of the settlement amount in the tribunal, with deductions for insurance liability if applicable, and ordered tribunal to execute the award upon fund receipt without imposing court fees under Legal Services Authority Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 389/2025
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission approved a settlement between petitioner Mohmed Azahar Mohmed Ismail and respondents Keshav Hirachand Mistri and Hiranand Mahavirprasad Mistri, awarding compensation of ₹3,00,000 in a motor accident claim (Case 389/2025). The court directed deposit of the settlement amount in the tribunal, with deductions for insurance liability if applicable, and ordered tribunal to execute the award upon fund receipt without imposing court fees under Legal Services Authority Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts