STATE OF GUJARAT vs NISAR ANVAR BADAM @ JANGALIYO Advocate - S A SAIYED — 211/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114,411,413. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJPM010035052023

Case disposed

Filing Number

211/2023

Filing Date

23-11-2023

Registration No

211/2023

Registration Date

23-11-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

GODHRA TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2009

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114,411,413

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

NISAR ANVAR BADAM @ JANGALIYO Advocate - S A SAIYED

JUBER YAKUB MOHAN

Adv. S A SAIYED

ANVAR BASHIR HAYAT

Adv. G S SAMNANI

RUPESHKUMAR KANTILAL SONI

Adv. H K SONI

Hearing History

Judge: 19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

26-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Nisar Anvar Badam & Others (Sessions Case 211/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all four accused (Nisar Anvar Badam, Juber Yakub Mohan, Anvar Bashir Hayat, and Rupeshkumar Kantilal Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 read with Section 114 for alleged burglary and theft on grounds that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The judge found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding witness testimony from panchas (village elders) whose credibility was severely undermined during cross-examination, combined with insufficient corroboration of stolen materials and lack of direct evidence linking accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Nisar Anvar Badam & Others (Sessions Case 211/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all four accused (Nisar Anvar Badam, Juber Yakub Mohan, Anvar Bashir Hayat, and Rupeshkumar Kantilal Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 read with Section 114 for alleged burglary and theft on grounds that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The judge found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding witness testimony from panchas (village elders) whose credibility was severely undermined during cross-examination, combined with insufficient corroboration of stolen materials and lack of direct evidence linking accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case