STATE OF GUJARAT vs NISAR ANVAR BADAM @ JANGALIYO Advocate - S A SAIYED — 211/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114,411,413. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJPM010035052023

Filing Number

211/2023

Filing Date

23-Nov-2023

Registration No

211/2023

Registration Date

23-Nov-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

GODHRA TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2009

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114,411,413

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NISAR ANVAR BADAM @ JANGALIYO Advocate - S A SAIYED

  2. 2.JUBER YAKUB MOHAN

    Adv. S A SAIYED

  3. 3.ANVAR BASHIR HAYAT

    Adv. G S SAMNANI

  4. 4.RUPESHKUMAR KANTILAL SONI

    Adv. H K SONI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Nisar Anvar Badam & Others (Sessions Case 211/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all four accused (Nisar Anvar Badam, Juber Yakub Mohan, Anvar Bashir Hayat, and Rupeshkumar Kantilal Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 read with Section 114 for alleged burglary and theft on grounds that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The judge found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding witness testimony from panchas (village elders) whose credibility was severely undermined during cross-examination, combined with insufficient corroboration of stolen materials and lack of direct evidence linking accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  17. 05-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    8th Addl District Judge

  18. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 01-Mar-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 13-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  23. 11-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  24. 12-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  26. 21-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  27. 20-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  28. 27-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  29. 01-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  31. 31-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  32. 29-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  33. 28-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 23-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Nisar Anvar Badam & Others (Sessions Case 211/2023) Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all four accused (Nisar Anvar Badam, Juber Yakub Mohan, Anvar Bashir Hayat, and Rupeshkumar Kantilal Soni) of charges under IPC Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 read with Section 114 for alleged burglary and theft on grounds that prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The judge found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding witness testimony from panchas (village elders) whose credibility was severely undermined during cross-examination, combined with insufficient corroboration of stolen materials and lack of direct evidence linking accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case