DIPAKKUMAR SHANTILAL PATEL vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - R S THAKOR — 44/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th April 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJPM010034802025

Case disposed

Filing Number

44/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

44/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1020

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Indian Penal Code Section 465,466,467,468,469,471,193,196,199,205,120B,201

Petitioner(s)

DIPAKKUMAR SHANTILAL PATEL

Adv. V R PATEL

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - R S THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

18-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

27-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

12-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

06-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CrRA No. 44/2025 Decision: The court rejected advocate Dipakkumar Shantilal Patel's revision application seeking discharge from Criminal Case No. 891/24. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a criminal conspiracy involving forged documents related to a dairy cooperative misappropriation case, determining that the trial court correctly rejected his discharge application and that the allegations require full trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CrRA No. 44/2025 Decision: The court rejected advocate Dipakkumar Shantilal Patel's revision application seeking discharge from Criminal Case No. 891/24. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a criminal conspiracy involving forged documents related to a dairy cooperative misappropriation case, determining that the trial court correctly rejected his discharge application and that the allegations require full trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case