MANJULABEN RMANJI THAKOR vs PRAKASH HIRALAL KHATRI Advocate - B M PATEL — 542/2014

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 005. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPM010030422014

Filing Number

542/2014

Filing Date

07-Jul-2014

Registration No

542/2014

Registration Date

10-Jul-2014

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 005

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJULABEN RMANJI THAKOR

    Adv. I I KHARADI

  2. 2.SHOBHABEN RAMNJI THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH HIRALAL KHATRI Advocate - B M PATEL

  2. 2.ASIAN CEMICAL COMPANY(Legal Heir)

  3. 3.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. P L GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the applicants' plea to condone an 11-month delay in filing a restoration application for their father's fatal vehicular accident claim (originally filed in 1991). The Tribunal found the restoration application itself untenable since the original claim was dismissed on merits for failure to produce required documentary evidence, and rejected the applicants' excuse of ignorance, noting they had actively participated in substituting their names when they attained majority. Each applicant was ordered to pay Rs. 5,000 costs to the DLSA. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 19-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 14-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 11-May-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 06-May-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 05-May-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 04-May-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Addl District Judge

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  13. 13-Mar-2026

    Restored

    6th Addl District Judge

  14. 13-Apr-2017

    OrderView PDF

  15. 13-Apr-2017

    Restored

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  16. 13-Apr-2017

    Disposed

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  17. 13-Apr-2017

    Disposed

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  18. 12-Apr-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  19. 22-Mar-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    7th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  20. 10-Mar-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    7th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  21. 23-Feb-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  22. 08-Feb-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    6th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  23. 07-Jan-2017

    Notice To Opponents

    7th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  24. 15-Dec-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    7th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  25. 28-Nov-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    8th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  26. 20-Oct-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  27. 20-Sep-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  28. 12-Aug-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  29. 27-Jun-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  30. 13-May-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  31. 02-Apr-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  32. 02-Mar-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  33. 02-Feb-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  34. 02-Jan-2016

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  35. 07-Dec-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    9th Ad-Hoc Additional District Judge

  36. 19-Nov-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  37. 08-Oct-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  38. 24-Sep-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  39. 14-Sep-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  40. 20-Aug-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  41. 09-Jul-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  42. 03-Jul-2015

    Notice To Opponents

    5th Addl District Judge

  43. 17-Nov-2014

    Notice To Opponents

  44. 13-Oct-2014

    Notice To Opponents

  45. 19-Sep-2014

    Notice To Opponents

  46. 13-Jul-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 07-Jul-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 542/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the applicants' plea to condone an 11-month delay in filing a restoration application for their father's fatal vehicular accident claim (originally filed in 1991). The Tribunal found the restoration application itself untenable since the original claim was dismissed on merits for failure to produce required documentary evidence, and rejected the applicants' excuse of ignorance, noting they had actively participated in substituting their names when they attained majority. Each applicant was ordered to pay Rs. 5,000 costs to the DLSA. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case