STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANAS ISHAK BOKDA Advocate - S S CHARKHA — 182/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),506(2). Status: Final Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJPM010028742023
Filing Number
182/2023
Filing Date
16-Sep-2023
Registration No
182/2023
Registration Date
16-Sep-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
084
Police Station
GODHRA CITY - B DIVISION POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANAS ISHAK BOKDA Advocate - S S CHARKHA
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 182/2023 The Sessions Court at Godhra allowed accused Anas Bokda's application to re-open his right of cross-examination of the victim. The court found that although the defence counsel had previously failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities, resulting in closure of cross-examination rights, the accused should not be deprived of his fundamental right to defence as cross-examination was essential to establish his defence and would affect the trial's outcome. No costs were ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 182/2023
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 182/2023 The Sessions Court at Godhra allowed accused Anas Bokda's application to re-open his right of cross-examination of the victim. The court found that although the defence counsel had previously failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities, resulting in closure of cross-examination rights, the accused should not be deprived of his fundamental right to defence as cross-examination was essential to establish his defence and would affect the trial's outcome. No costs were ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts