HEIRS OF DECEASED DIPAKKUAMR JETHABHAI NAYKA 1.MALIBEN DIPAKBHAI NAYKA vs Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. — 180/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJPM010020402025
Filing Number
180/2025
Filing Date
05-May-2025
Registration No
180/2025
Registration Date
05-May-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIRS OF DECEASED DIPAKKUAMR JETHABHAI NAYKA 1.MALIBEN DIPAKBHAI NAYKA
Adv. L R KHATWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the insurance claim petition filed by the heirs of Dipakkumar Jethabhai Nayka against Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., finding that a prior Vidarbha Pursuit had already been resolved with compensation awarded to the claimants on January 17, 2026. The court held that since the settlement was already concluded and compensation received, no further claims could be entertained, and the petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 180/2025
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the insurance claim petition filed by the heirs of Dipakkumar Jethabhai Nayka against Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., finding that a prior Vidarbha Pursuit had already been resolved with compensation awarded to the claimants on January 17, 2026. The court held that since the settlement was already concluded and compensation received, no further claims could be entertained, and the petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts