VINODBHAI HIMMATSINH ZALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 25/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPM010010052022

FINAL HEARING

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

Filing Number

25/2022

Filing Date

16-04-2022

Registration No

25/2022

Registration Date

16-04-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,504,506(2),498
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 Section 3

Petitioner(s)

VINODBHAI HIMMATSINH ZALA

Adv. M A KHARADI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

10-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

06-12-2025

FINAL HEARING

16-10-2025

FINAL HEARING

15-09-2025

FINAL HEARING

Interim Orders

28-01-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 25/2022 Vinodbhai Himmatsinh Zala appealed his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, and the Prevention of Dowry Act. During the appeal, both parties submitted a compromise petition stating they had amicably settled their dispute and agreed to part ways. However, the court rejected the compromise because Section 498(A) (cruelty by husband/relatives) is a non-compoundable offence, placing quashing power exclusively with the High Court, not the Sessions Court. The compromise petition was rejected and the appeal proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 25/2022 Vinodbhai Himmatsinh Zala appealed his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, and the Prevention of Dowry Act. During the appeal, both parties submitted a compromise petition stating they had amicably settled their dispute and agreed to part ways. However, the court rejected the compromise because Section 498(A) (cruelty by husband/relatives) is a non-compoundable offence, placing quashing power exclusively with the High Court, not the Sessions Court. The compromise petition was rejected and the appeal proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case