GANGABEN D/O RAYSING BHAGAJI AND W/O PATEL BHARATSINH vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 286/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010009172026

Case disposed

Filing Number

286/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

286/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

GODHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 336(2),336(3),338,340(2)

Petitioner(s)

GANGABEN D/O RAYSING BHAGAJI AND W/O PATEL BHARATSINH

Adv. A A ISMAILWALA

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 6-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

06-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

ORDER

23-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

13-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CrMA No. 286/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Gangaben's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. Key Facts: Gangaben (age 77) sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery of her mother's death certificate. She claimed she obtained it legitimately from the Talati (revenue official) and used it in proceedings before the Collector. The Talati, however, filed a complaint denying he issued the document. Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the applicant supported by primary evidence, with the investigation at a crucial stage requiring custodial interrogation. The court determined this was not an exceptional case warranting judicial discretion and noted that releasing her on bail would hamper ongoing investigation and prejudice the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CrMA No. 286/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Gangaben's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. Key Facts: Gangaben (age 77) sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery of her mother's death certificate. She claimed she obtained it legitimately from the Talati (revenue official) and used it in proceedings before the Collector. The Talati, however, filed a complaint denying he issued the document. Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the applicant supported by primary evidence, with the investigation at a crucial stage requiring custodial interrogation. The court determined this was not an exceptional case warranting judicial discretion and noted that releasing her on bail would hamper ongoing investigation and prejudice the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case