MOHAMMED ARIF ABDUL RAJAK SAMOL vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - SPP — 284/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010008952026

Filing Number

284/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

284/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

717

Police Station

GODHRA CITY - B DIVISION POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2017 Section 5(1),6(B),8(2),8(4),10
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 325
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 119

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED ARIF ABDUL RAJAK SAMOL

    Adv. S A SAIYED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - SPP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court rejected Mohammad Aarif Abdul Razak Samol's bail application for alleged beef possession violations under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The court found strong prima facie evidence—23kg of beef recovered during a police raid—and noted the applicant's criminal antecedents in similar offences, prior rejection of anticipatory bail, co-accused persons absconding, and severe statutory punishment, making continued detention justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 284/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Mohammad Aarif Abdul Razak Samol's bail application for alleged beef possession violations under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. The court found strong prima facie evidence—23kg of beef recovered during a police raid—and noted the applicant's criminal antecedents in similar offences, prior rejection of anticipatory bail, co-accused persons absconding, and severe statutory punishment, making continued detention justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case