NAVEENKUMAR SHANABHAI PAGI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 278/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010008752026

Case disposed

Filing Number

278/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

278/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1100

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),115(2),351(2),64(2)(M),65(1),352
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,6,12

Petitioner(s)

NAVEENKUMAR SHANABHAI PAGI

Adv. D A SHETH

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

COMPLAINANT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Navinkumar Shanabhai Pagi, accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old minor with threats and violence under BNS sections and POCSO Act. The court found that releasing him posed a risk of offense repetition and held that merely filing the charge-sheet constituted no material change in circumstances warranting bail approval after his earlier bail application (CrMA 999/2025) was rejected on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Navinkumar Shanabhai Pagi, accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old minor with threats and violence under BNS sections and POCSO Act. The court found that releasing him posed a risk of offense repetition and held that merely filing the charge-sheet constituted no material change in circumstances warranting bail approval after his earlier bail application (CrMA 999/2025) was rejected on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case