IMRAN AADAM MADARI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 265/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS
CNR: GJPM010008242026
Filing Number
265/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
265/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
GODHRA CITY - B DIVISION POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IMRAN AADAM MADARI
Adv. M A MANSURI
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 265/2026 - Imran Aadam Madari v. State of Gujarat The court rejected Imran Aadam Madari's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. The applicant was charged with causing grievous hurt using dangerous weapons (iron pipe and knife) in collusion with co-accused. Although he claimed an alibi—providing CCTV footage showing him at Hotel Laziz at the time of offense—the court found the timestamp (11:33 p.m.) contradicted the complaint's stated offense time (ending 11:30 p.m.). The investigating officer confirmed the applicant was not at the hotel during the relevant period. Considering the prima facie case, serious nature of the offense, victim's documented injuries, pending investigation at a critical stage, and applicant's role as a key link to remaining investigative clues, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary and anticipated bail would prejudice the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 265/2026 - Imran Aadam Madari v. State of Gujarat The court rejected Imran Aadam Madari's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. The applicant was charged with causing grievous hurt using dangerous weapons (iron pipe and knife) in collusion with co-accused. Although he claimed an alibi—providing CCTV footage showing him at Hotel Laziz at the time of offense—the court found the timestamp (11:33 p.m.) contradicted the complaint's stated offense time (ending 11:30 p.m.). The investigating officer confirmed the applicant was not at the hotel during the relevant period. Considering the prima facie case, serious nature of the offense, victim's documented injuries, pending investigation at a critical stage, and applicant's role as a key link to remaining investigative clues, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary and anticipated bail would prejudice the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts