IMRAN AADAM MADARI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 265/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010008242026

Filing Number

265/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

265/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

GODHRA CITY - B DIVISION POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125(A),117(2),118(2),352,351(2),351(3),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IMRAN AADAM MADARI

    Adv. M A MANSURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: Case 265/2026 - Imran Aadam Madari v. State of Gujarat The court rejected Imran Aadam Madari's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. The applicant was charged with causing grievous hurt using dangerous weapons (iron pipe and knife) in collusion with co-accused. Although he claimed an alibi—providing CCTV footage showing him at Hotel Laziz at the time of offense—the court found the timestamp (11:33 p.m.) contradicted the complaint's stated offense time (ending 11:30 p.m.). The investigating officer confirmed the applicant was not at the hotel during the relevant period. Considering the prima facie case, serious nature of the offense, victim's documented injuries, pending investigation at a critical stage, and applicant's role as a key link to remaining investigative clues, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary and anticipated bail would prejudice the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 265/2026 - Imran Aadam Madari v. State of Gujarat The court rejected Imran Aadam Madari's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. The applicant was charged with causing grievous hurt using dangerous weapons (iron pipe and knife) in collusion with co-accused. Although he claimed an alibi—providing CCTV footage showing him at Hotel Laziz at the time of offense—the court found the timestamp (11:33 p.m.) contradicted the complaint's stated offense time (ending 11:30 p.m.). The investigating officer confirmed the applicant was not at the hotel during the relevant period. Considering the prima facie case, serious nature of the offense, victim's documented injuries, pending investigation at a critical stage, and applicant's role as a key link to remaining investigative clues, the court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary and anticipated bail would prejudice the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case