RAJESHBHAI URFE RAJUBHAI JOGABHAI BHARWAD vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 263/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010008222026

Filing Number

263/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

263/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

2-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 324(3),54
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 4(1)A,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI URFE RAJUBHAI JOGABHAI BHARWAD

    Adv. S S CHARKHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary: The Panchmahal District Court partially granted the accused's petition to modify bail conditions under CrPC Section 483(1)(b). The court removed the restrictive condition requiring the accused to remain present within Panchmahal district during the entire criminal proceedings, allowing instead conditional travel permission limited to attendance at wedding events on specific dates (March 7-8, 2026) in other locations, while imposing restrictions against visiting other places and fraternizing with co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 263/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Panchmahal District Court partially granted the accused's petition to modify bail conditions under CrPC Section 483(1)(b). The court removed the restrictive condition requiring the accused to remain present within Panchmahal district during the entire criminal proceedings, allowing instead conditional travel permission limited to attendance at wedding events on specific dates (March 7-8, 2026) in other locations, while imposing restrictions against visiting other places and fraternizing with co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case